When I search for something I would expect the search results to show the newest to oldest but that is not what is happening and wtih the poor date format it is hard to tell what even is the return listing order.
Can you
change the date format so I can see the full date (Aug 20 can mean 2 different things)
change the sort order default to newest to oldest.
@Joe, what do you think about it? There’s an option called “Search default sort order” that we could change to show the newest topics at the top. It makes sense most of the time since we basically moderate each post.
in the search results that are in no apparent order when you see aug 20 you cannot work out if it was a recent (2025-08-20) post or one from years back (2020-08) so you have to waste time opening the result to find out.
Also with how the Americans do dates that adds another spanner in the works.
I disagree on this one. Discourse handles it perfectly with relative dates—it clearly shows either “Aug 2020” or “Aug 20”, so there’s no way to confuse them.
Plus, if you hover over the date for a moment, the full date and time appear anyway.
Yeah, I think defaulting to newest first is sensible. I think that’s usually what I want when I’m searching…in a forum that has posts dating back 20 years, there’s a lot of irrelevant/wrong old stuff here, and it’s easy to end up with out-of-date advice. Virtualmin evolves slowly and cautiously, but not that slowly.
Now the dates are in descending order on the search there is context and they are a lot more usable eg:
5d
15d
Aug 13
Aug 8
Still I prefer YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.sTZD as this is logically perfect. but obviously I am happy with the fix and I am not asking for this format to be used.
I find the date repesentation inconsistency kind of annoying, actually. But, I also agree we shouldn’t write code to try to solve it. Sometimes we just have to trust the Discourse devs thought things through, did some research, and landed on a good compromise.
What exactly is inconsistent though? Aug 2025 can’t really be mistaken for Aug 25. Sure, at first glance Aug 25 might look like August 2025, but once you hover over it and see the full date, or see Aug 2025 elsewhere, it becomes completely clear which one it is.
I think you missed part of the thread. I said I was happy with the change and that it made sense now because of context.
I was having a discussion about the date format because I think that @Ilia does like to hear how things look from around the world, and we Brits did invent time
If we always go with the flow, opportunitys for improvement are missed and makes feedback on a forum pointless.
My contributions are always positive and I leave the final decisions to the developers as it is their project. It is nice that they listen, irrelevant of the outcome.