AlmaLinux 9.4
Webmin version 2.111
Usermin version 2.010
Virtualmin version 7.10.0
I host few domains. Some of them have Mail disabled.
After a long time without issues I got my IP blacklisted in invaluement.com
Domains that have Email enabled get 10/10 points at EasyDMARC.com report (DMARC, DKIM, SPF & BIMI).
Should I worry about those domains that have Mail disabled and make some arrangements for them?
Thank you
May just be overly aggressive.
www.invaluement.com/removal/
See if they can provide the offending email or, gasp, will suggest that for a fee you can speed up delisting. I had one place try this, (baracuda?) and I told them I’d just file a complaint with the FTC for interference with interstate commerce. They immediately removed me.
Maybe worry about why it you got blacklisted if they will even pretend to give you any info. Not sure why you would worry about the disabled mail?
Perhaps because it is the IP that is blacklisted not specifically email?
Are they blocking your mail server by way of MX record or the IP Address?
They could be blocking the entire CIDR that you are in. In that case I don’t think you can request an unblock.
If you are not the culprit and find yourself on more spam list, I would contact the IP provider and ask for another IP not in that range. They will sometimes do it for you no problem.
Thank you all for your help.
I asked them to unlist my IP and more info about the issue.
Added to ivmSIP24 at 6/11/2024 8:29:07 AM (UTC-03:00) City of Buenos Aires
Blacklist Severity: Critical
MxRep Current Score: 92
The report came from MXToolBox.
I remember a friend of mine had a similar issue but his IP was not the problem but some of other IPs in the range.
I checked now again and ivmSIP24 has unlisted my IP 
That’s not a thing. The FTC doesn’t require anyone to accept email from anyone else.
Well, doesn’t matter cuz it worked. 
Basically they blacklisted everyone unless a bribe was paid. They didn’t care if I was a spammer. That wasn’t even an issue. They just wanted cash to get off their list. They didn’t want anybody looking into their business model probably. But, this was a few decades ago now.
But in theory, they blocked possible commerce just like any gang in a lawless country setting up checkpoints every couple hundred yards to extort money. From a legal standpoint? I’m not a lawyer but I’d rather be on my side of that argument in a lawsuit.
You certainly should never pay someone to get off a blacklist. Fix the problems, make sure you’re not sending spam, make sure your users aren’t sending spam, then request de-listing. Then, hope for the best. If they’re a legitimate blacklist, they just want to prevent spam/abuse.
That’s becoming more of an issue. I haven’t had to do a lot of getting de-listed but recently have NEVER received feedback on the alleged problem.
Are you getting dmarc reports, the rua= in the _dmarc TXT
This test check if that will work ok plus if it looks ok.
Not sure BIMI is a big deal plus I thought it was a paid service especially if google will show it. I never bothered with it.
BIMI has nothing to do with delivery (or, it should have nothing to do with delivery, I guess somebody will decide they only want email from the biggest corporations).
BIMI is exclusively for businesses that have a registered trademark. If you block mail based on presence of BIMI, you will only allow commercial mail. It’s like an “only commercial mail” characteristic. If you want to block mail from your mom and allow mail from Amazon, maybe you want to treat BIMI as a spam filtering characteristic.
Only one of hosted domains has a bimi logo. The others comply DMARC, DKIM and SPF.
Despite IP was delisted I am trying to figure out why it was listed.
Thank you all.
Did it cost much to do it out of interest?
Are you getting dmarc reports (if they reporting to you), that should help.
Money=0 Work=putting a svg logo in a public directory and add a DNS record.
I receive weekly reports from Postmark (for one domain only). Last one SPF and DKIM 100% aligned
I thought you had to have a PEM certificate that has been issued for this to work?
Some email providers support BIMI with a TXT record that refers to an Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) file only. However, to display BIMI logos in Gmail, you must use a TXT record that refers to a Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM) file. The PEM file includes your logo.
Yeah that what I thought too.
“Mail from was refused due to the sender IP found in ERS-Blocked-Country-Region-List”
This List is not included in MX Toolbox
Not much you can do there if the person on the receiving end is purposely blocking it based on country of origin.
Obtaining a registered trademark costs at minimum a few hundred dollars in the US, a lot more if you involve a lawyer.
Is this out of date? (From Google’s docs.)
Logos used with BIMI must be trademarked with an intellectual property office that’s recognized by Verified Mark Certificate (VMC) issuers. You need to verify that your brand logo is trademarked. If not, we recommend that you work with your legal team or a lawyer to have your logo trademarked. The trademark process can take from 6 months to over a year.
The BIMI standard is being expanded to include logos that aren’t trademarked.
Has that last sentence come to pass? Can a non-trademarked logo be used now and without fees?