PHP 8.5 Missing From selectors

[retched]

SYSTEM INFORMATION
OS type and version	AlmaLinux 9.7
Virtualmin version	7.50.0 GPL

So I went through and followed the steps for installing new versions of PHP (before this post, I have 8.0 (system “maximum”), 8.3 (per the guide), and 8.4 (also from the guide). I followed the same instructions to install 8.5 and its associated configurations and modules. While I can see the new PHP version listed in Webmin > Tools > PHP Configuration list of versions, going to Virtualmin and checking the configurations, it only lists the first three that I listed. Trying to bump it up to the newest available for a server, the server cannot switch to 8.5.0.

What did I miss?

For sake of example:

A server’s configuration:

Additionally, I tried to enable the systemd unit that was made for 8.5 and restart, but to no avail.

[ID10T]

Usually I’m loath to do this on something I can’t test directly, but the AI suggestion from search:

Re-check Configuration: After installing new PHP versions, navigate to “System Settings” → “Re-Check Configuration” in Virtualmin to ensure they are detected and available.

It does seem to do the check at least and should be non-destructive.

[retched]

Ran that one too:

Even removed and readded the module. Same thing.

[Joe]

Show us which PHP 8.5 packages you have installed.

[retched]

These?

[Joe]

No. You installed packages when following our documentation. Show us what you actually installed for PHP 8.5.

Something like:

rpm -qa |grep php|grep 85

[ID10T]

@Joe Does this do a full install?

[retched]

@Joe

rpm -qa |grep php|grep 85

That yields me:

[Ilia]

Apply this patch and give it another shot:

webmin patch https://github.com/virtualmin/virtualmin-gpl/commit/d2f87b1

[retched]

@Ilia

Apply this patch and give it another shot:

webmin patch https://github.com/virtualmin/virtualmin-gpl/commit/d2f87b1

Can confirm applying this patch has the option appear in the server configuration screen and is found during the re-check configuration app.

(Not sure I should mark this as a solution though.)

(Looking at the code, yup that’s a solution… a temp one but still.)