In reference to this discussion:
I would like to express my disappointment with the way the @staff has handled the matter of gender-neutral language.
I am deeply unsettled that a hasty decision was made based on a single, unqualified and offensive comment. The adoption of gender-neutral language is not merely a passing trend, but a reflection of social responsibility. Unfortunately, such efforts frequently encounter resistance — often from politically conservative circles that cling to a notion of “proper” language while rejecting diversity, not only in speech but also in society as a whole.
Nevertheless, like many others, I strive to build bridges, to foster understanding, and to make language more inclusive. I am well aware that such efforts do not always meet with approval. But those who seek change must expect headwinds — and need strong, dependable allies. I had hoped to have found such allies within your team.
The fact that you have so abruptly reversed your position, and are basing that reversal on a single, defamatory contribution, raises doubts for me about the sincerity of your commitment.
I will be taking a break from my work on translations and will reflect on whether and how I wish to continue contributing in future. Ilja had already expressed the view that AI translations were sufficient, so should I not return, it will likely be of little consequence to you.
I will continue to support you financially. However, I will also be citing this incident as a cautionary example of how not to respond to constructive engagement — in both personal and professional settings.
What pains me most is not just the decision itself, but the speed and rationale with which it was made. Commitment deserves more than a knee-jerk reaction to vocal opposition. It calls for respect, resolve, and an awareness of the responsibility that comes with projects sustained by a diverse community. The decision to abandon inclusive language sends a clear message — not just to me, but to everyone striving to make our (digital) world more open and equitable. You are, of course, free to change course. But those who do so should also be aware of the consequences — especially the quiet, long-term ones. Trust is built on reliability. And reliability reveals itself not in consensus, but in moments of conflict.