Cloudmin install failing

@iliaross

Howdi Ilia

I had some free time and decided to try again to see how cloudmin was progressing.

I installed Deb 12 on a spare machine and downloaded the install script from Github.

The install fails with the following

Error: Failed to download utility function library. Cannot continue. Check your network connection and DNS settings, and verify that your system’s time is accurately synchronized.

As far as I can see DNS and network is working as I can ping eg google.com and I can wget the slib file from github.

So i’m not sure why the install script is having issues.

Any idea ? Im all ears.

Thanks
Michael

And this? Is the time set correctly on the spare server?

I know you are an experienced systems administrator but sometimes it is the little things that stump the best of us.

Howdi

That was also done, I thought to myself I bet someone asks me about the time after I hit post :laughing:

It only works right now if you use the --branch unstable flag.

Hi Ilia
Do you mean
‘-B unstable’ or --branch unstable ?
Thanks
Michael

Yeah, this is what I said in the previous comment, as far as I remember. :slight_smile:

Which one is my question. You gave me -B unstable in a private message and --branch unstable in this post ?

Or are you saying either will work ?

I’m not at work any more so just checking so I can hit the ground running next week.

Thanks
Michael

I just looked in the install script it looks as though its

--branch / -B unstable

Either or

Also I’m guessing at this time there is no gpl version ?

Yes, both guesses are correct!

Also I’m guessing at this time there is no gpl version ?

Yes, there isn’t a GPL version currently.

I’m not the right person to ask this question though! @Jamie, @Joe, can you clarify the plans we discussed about Cloudmin earlier? Like splitting repos with cleaned up KVM-only version; and also the GPL vs Pro substantial difference? Or will the new Cloudmin 10 with KVM only have a Pro version and not GPL at all?

Ill grab a small pro copy next week to test this out, but I would also like an answer to those questions. Just so we can plan.

This is the first I’ve heard of no GPL version.

There is no version that works very well or installs on a recent OS. But, as far as I know both Pro and GPL are available.

To be clear, I think it’s best to wait until we’ve had a chance to fully overhaul the installer for Cloudmin. It’s a mess right now, and barely works on any recent OS. Software works, but the installer is a tragedy.

What’s currently available for download on the old site doesn’t work on debian 12 and up with out way to much BS, you know the one that says Copyright 2005-2011 Virtualmin, Inc and Debian 4.0 or later on i386 and x86_64 …

So what’s the plan for CM V10 Joseph :laughing:

I’m using a new one provided by Ilia (V10) and it seems to work ill know more next week now that I know it needs a key.

I gave up long ago on the old installer. I could not approve its use based on its not 3 pm on a Friday and 50 customers are screaming at us to get it fixed in a hurry ready.

There is already a software.cloudmin.dev repo and new installer that works just fine with the --branch unstable and --branch rc flags.

However, it still doesn’t handle all those configuration steps that precisely. We talked many times that for it to budge, @Jamie should create virtualmin/cloudmin-gpl and virtualmin/cloudmin-pro with repos and working code that only include KVM version—this is something we agreed on earlier.

It will be then easy to make it follow our standard building process in Webmin CI/CD, and for users to file bug reports in the public Cloudmin GPL repository. Right now, there’s even no way to file a bug report. Without this, we won’t be able to make much progress with Cloudmin. The README.md of Cloudmin GPL repo should clearly state the difference between the GPL and Pro versions, so it’s clear for everyone.

If I remember correctly, we discussed at some point that Cloudmin 10 should be a Pro-only version, since it doesn’t make much sense to invest so much time in a product that barely brings in any revenue. I still have doubts that it would be profitable even as a fully Pro version.

Yet, I’d be for a pro GPL version if it was limited, like 3 free virtual machines or something like that, which makes sense.

There are still a lot of open questions and unresolved details. Once we sort everything out, have KVM-only code with a new repo and I make it buildable (which is the easy part), then we can start talking about when to release it, and which particular bugs to fix and for which distro before that.


For now, my main priority is to release Virtualmin 7.50.0 this weekend and finish the new concept for the virtualmin.com landing page by next week—it’s hugely time consuming and difficult work!

You should mention me as @Ilia, not @iliaross. That’s just my testing account.

We definitely did not discuss that. Or, I certainly didn’t agree to that.

Just an end users point of view, a free/gpl version allows people to use and test a software and upgrade to pro if needed.

Upto 3 for free at most, but I thought there was a free version with just 1 VM available.

This is not a product for me because I run virtualmin on truenas.