No need, thats good, it just wont create more processes for every mail you receive, it just uses that one to scan every mail, its slower but a lot more resource friendly.
anything change!, now the header include x-spam
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxa.es
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MPART_ALT_DIFF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Original-To: info@xxxxxxxxxxxxs.es
but x-spam level is empty, is it normal??
i restart system, but clamav still “eat” 1.25g, normal??
which is the mean of standalone need to be disable?, risk?, advantage?
Level is empty for me too but whats important is the score, when 4 (in your case) or above it identifies it as spam, you got a -4.5 so definitly not spam.
Yes, 1.25g is normal, as i said before, the difference is that it wont create more processes consuming 1.25gb extra for every email, with the previous configuration everytime you received a mail anothe 1.25gb was consumed, if you received 2 it would consume 2.5gb, now its only 1.25gb regardless of the amount of mail you receive.
whoww, this is a lot of ram if i receive a rain of mails!!
tx i test a day and i brief you and every body about the result, include if we have sucess
tx a lot
2 Likes
turn off clamv server and focus on spamc first. clamv will kill your server and provides almost no benefit. spamc is what you want for spam.
This topic was automatically closed 60 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.