This doesn’t happen for all system packages, but for a lot I am getting this type of error (CentOS :
As you can see it reports an error unpacking, but also reports that the install was complete. Is this something to be concerned about?
A side question: Also above says “warning: /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf saved as /etc/rc.d/init.d/arptables_jf.rpmsave”. Why does this happen and what does it mean? Do I have to do something with the rmpsave files?
A config file isn’t at it’s default (or so the RPM thinks)
The RPM is configured to put the new config file it has into production
Rather than simply overwrite what you have there, it’s notifying you that it’s saving the current file as “.rpmsave” before copying the new file out there.
Which all means absolutely nothing, so long as everything continues to work as expected
If, on the other hand, you notice any unusual behavior, you’ll want to compare the new config versus the old one, and determine what changed in order to get things working again.
I’d keep the rpmsave files around until you’re absolutely certain that everything is working as expected.
This is going to be an error with yum or RPM or the package, and not something we’re going to have any control over. You’ll probably need to bring it up with your OS provider.
But, to further narrow it down: does this error happen when you install something using RPM directly?
Thank you both I found the problem. This box is compromised and the immutable bit was set on those files not allowing them to be overwritten. The box is offline pending an overhaul.
Now another question, how do you force rpm to (re)install a particular package without worrying about its dependencies? I dont think you can do this with yum but can with rpm, but I rarely use rpm so am unsure…like for initscripts.x86_64.